3 Comments
User's avatar
John Miskinis's avatar

I do not understand in the least, why the entire set of files is not considered one entity and simply made public.

I have read countless speculations, as to why it may be such a "hush hush" topic, and that so-and-so might be involved or implicated, and perhaps some of those people are still in, or have been in power.

I'll refrain from naming specific countries, or specific individuals, and I truly look forward to reading what other readers have to say on this topic. This is my first comment on this system, and I hope that it is received well, and also that it is appreciated. Perhaps I will contribute more in the future, and I want to make it clear that I have no stake in this myself whatsoever. I am a retired Principle Computer Software Engineer and "tinkerer/inventor" that prefers to distance myself from politics, but calls into radio shows on rare occasions, mostly in the Boston, Massachusetts area.

Happy Holidays to all, wherever you may be, John Miskinis

Expand full comment
The Allen Analysis's avatar

This is exactly the right question, and it’s one many reasonable people are asking.

When Congress passes a law mandating disclosure, the default should be full release, not piecemeal drops, silent redactions, or files quietly disappearing after the fact. Treating these records as fragmented, negotiable disclosures instead of a single public archive is what fuels distrust.

Expand full comment