Inside the Pressure Campaign: FBI Insiders Say They Are Being Ordered to Target Trump’s Political Enemies
By Brian Allen
The federal law enforcement crisis no one is supposed to talk about
Something is breaking inside the FBI. And this time it is not partisan spin or manufactured outrage. It is coming directly from the people inside the building.
Multiple FBI insiders say they are being pressured to investigate Democratic lawmakers and public figures who have angered Donald Trump. These allegations detailed in Raw Story’s reporting and independently echoed by two internal sources describe “directive pressure” on field agents to prioritize cases that align with Trump’s personal grievances rather than legitimate criminal leads (Raw Story, 2025).
This is the precise crisis career agents warned about when Trump installed political loyalists into key national security positions during his second term. It is not abstract anymore. It is operational.
One insider told Raw Story that senior officials were pushing agents to open or “revisit” cases tied to figures Trump publicly attacked. Another said the internal mood has shifted from caution to fear. As the source put it, “People feel hunted.”
And the language in these accounts is not vague. It is unmistakable.
One whistleblower described the emerging structure as:
“A political filter placed on investigative priorities, designed to target those whom the president views as enemies.”
This is the precise weaponization Trump spent years accusing others of. Now internal voices say it is happening for real.
What FBI insiders say is happening right now
According to Raw Story’s reporting and supplemental accounts from internal channels, several patterns are emerging.
Agents claim they are being directed to advance or reopen “pretext investigations” into Democratic members of Congress and state officials who publicly challenged Trump’s policies or exposed internal misconduct. These are not investigations born from criminal referrals or federal leads. They are rooted in revenge politics.
One insider described the pressure as “persistent inquiry” from leadership asking whether “any actionable predicate exists” to pursue cases tied to high-profile Democrats.
Another described the environment more bluntly:
“The new requirement is not evidence. It is whether the target upset the president.”
If true, this marks a fundamental break from the FBI’s founding mandate, which requires political neutrality and independence in federal investigations. It also matches a pattern visible across Trump’s second administration: the elevation of political loyalty over professional qualification.
This accusation becomes even more serious when set against the broader national security landscape.
Why this is bigger than isolated whistleblowing
These reports are emerging at the same time as a parallel scandal involving Pete Hegseth and senior military leadership. According to Wall Street Journal reporting, Hegseth ordered a top admiral to resign after months of internal conflict over the legality of Trump’s military directives (WSJ, 2025). That same week, investigative reporting revealed that Hegseth used encrypted Signal chats to issue politically motivated directives outside of the traditional chain of command.
These two developments are not separate events. They are pieces of the same architecture.
One at the Pentagon.
One at the FBI.
Both reflecting a consolidation of political power inside federal law enforcement and military institutions.
And the whistleblowers appear to understand this. One told Raw Story:
“When the Pentagon gets pressured, and the Bureau gets pressured, and the same political circle is orchestrating both, then it is not internal politics. It is a structural takeover.”
This is not subtle. This is the blueprint Trump advisers openly discussed during Project 2025 briefings. A president with the power to direct federal prosecutions, target political rivals, and bend national security institutions into partisan tools.
We are now watching that blueprint being implemented in plain sight.
Historical context: When political orders enter the FBI
The United States has seen political pressure applied to the FBI before. Hoover’s personal fiefdom. The post-9/11 surveillance expansions. The Bush administration’s pressure to fabricate intelligence ahead of the Iraq invasion.
But the current moment is different in one key way: prior administrations operated through institutional pressure. This one operates through personal vendetta.
The accusations do not suggest a policy dispute. They suggest a president demanding retaliation.
This is why the whistleblower accounts are so alarming. They paint a picture of a system bending toward Trump’s personal list of enemies.
As one insider said:
“This is not about politics versus politics. This is about the loss of law.”
What comes next
Congressional oversight is inevitable. Pressure from civil liberties groups is growing. Internal legal memos will likely leak. And if more agents step forward, the FBI will face the most significant institutional reckoning since the Church Committee of the 1970s.
But there is a darker possibility.
If these allegations are correct, the Bureau is already being reshaped from the inside. Not slowly. Not quietly. Rapidly.
The public must understand exactly what that means.
The FBI does not simply investigate crimes. It controls intelligence flow. It issues national security referrals. It supervises counterintelligence operations involving foreign governments. It determines whether threats to democracy are monitored or ignored.
If political loyalty hijacks that system, the consequences are not theoretical.
They are existential.
Final word
This story is not about one directive or one angry president. It is about whether federal law enforcement remains an arm of democracy or becomes an arm of personal power.
The whistleblowers are clear. The threat is real.
And if Congress fails to intervene, history will remember this moment not as a warning.
But as the turning point.
References
Raw Story. (2025). FBI insiders reveal they’re being pressured to investigate Democrats who angered Trump. https://www.rawstory.com
Wall Street Journal. (2025). Hegseth asked top admiral to resign after months of discord.
WHAT TO READ:
ICE detain U.S. citizen woman driving to work dressed in full medical scrubs.
She Screamed “I’m a U.S. Citizen.”
Signalgate: The Scandal That Could Bring Down Pete Hegseth Before the War Crimes Allegations Even Hit
House Democrats thought they were probing Pete Hegseth for illegal military strikes. They did not expect to find something far more explosive buried beneath the surface. But according to multiple officials familiar with an ongoing Pentagon inspector general review, the real scandal is not the strikes themselves.
Trump’s Glare Said Everything: The Vice President He Chose. The Disdain He Couldn’t Hide.
Donald Trump has never been skilled at hiding how he feels about people. He telegraphs alliances and resentments the way most presidents telegraph policy. But what unfolded inside the Cabinet Room this week was different. It was unfiltered. It was revealing. And according to analysts in the room, it was the moment Trump accidentally exposed what he real…
Trump’s Attack on Ilhan Omar Was Not a Gaffe. It Was a Strategy.
President Donald Trump ended his press conference this week with a moment that revealed far more than a single outburst. As routine questions were winding down, Trump abruptly pivoted away from policy, away from governance, and straight …
Trump Hit With $310 Million Lawsuit Alleging “Epstein-Identical” Trafficking Network
A new lawsuit has landed in the American political bloodstream with the force of a seismic shock. It accuses Donald Trump of participating in a trafficking enterprise that plaintiffs describe as “identical in every material respect to the Epstein operation” (Doe v. Trump et al., 2025). The suit also names Elon Musk, Bill Gates, and several organizations…
The Disappearing General: Why the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Vanished During Trump and Hegseth’s Caribbean Strikes
The most important figure in the United States military has vanished at the worst possible moment.This Substack is reader-supported. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
Rand Paul Breaks With Trump and Hegseth, Calling the Caribbean Strikes “Actually Illegal”
Senator Rand Paul did what almost no Republican in the Trump era has dared to do. He accused the President and his Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, of violating federal law. In a brief but remarkable interview, Paul declared, “I think both strikes are actually illegal.” His statement came after new disclosures revealed that the United States conducted o…
AT&T Customers Can Claim Up to $7,500, Here’s Exactly Who Qualifies and How to File Before the Deadline
Millions of AT&T customers are now eligible for cash payouts, up to $7,500 per person, after two massive data breaches exposed Social Security numbers, call records, and personal information for more than 180 million Americans. And the clock is ticking: the deadline to file a claim is December 18, 2025.
Costco vs. MAGA: The Warehouse Giant That Refused To Bow
Costco is not supposed to be political. It is the place Americans go for affordable groceries, a dependable paycheck, and a $1.50 hot dog that has outlasted six presidents. Yet Costco now sits at the center of a national political brawl because it did something most corporations have been too afraid to do. It stood its ground.